top of page

2. The Existing Evidence

  • Writer: Tom Payne
    Tom Payne
  • Jul 10
  • 1 min read

Updated: 6 days ago

So far as the existing evidence, I say, of former literature can be interpreted, the storm-cloud—or more accurately plague-cloud, for it is not always stormy—which I am about to describe to you, never was seen but by now living, or lately living eyes. It is not yet twenty years that this—I may well call it, wonderful—cloud has been, in its essence, recognizable. There is no description of it, so far as I have read, by any ancient observer. Neither Homer nor Virgil, neither Aristophanes nor Horace, acknowledge any such clouds among those compelled by Jove. Chaucer has no word of them, nor Dante; Milton none, nor Thomson. In modern times, Scott, Wordsworth, and Byron are alike unconscious of them; and the most observant and descriptive of scientific men, De Saussure, is utterly silent concerning them. Taking up the traditions of air from the year before Scott’s death, I am able, by my own constant and close observation, to certify you that in the forty following years (1831 to 1871 approximately—for the phenomena in question came on gradually)—no such clouds as these are, and are now often for months without intermission, were ever seen in the skies of England, France, or Italy.

 
 

Join the mailing list

Thanks for submitting!

Screen Shot 2024-05-16 at 20.08.36.png
Guild_of_St_George_logo (1).jpeg
ed1ca4fa-629f-4df2-b988-3c0f1ad19ba4-removebg-preview.png-4.avif
Sheffield Museums.png
Primary Logo 2 (1).jpeg

© 2025 Moot Works Ltd. All rights reserved.

All photography © Becky Payne

Storm-Cloud logo form by Jake Goodall

bottom of page