top of page

22. Frightful Inaccuracy of Scientific People

  • Jul 10, 2025
  • 3 min read

Updated: Dec 16, 2025

The main reason, however, why I can tell you nothing yet about these colours of diffraction or interference, is that, whenever I try to find anything firm for you to depend on, I am stopped by the quite frightful inaccuracy of the scientific people’s terms,[1] which is the consequence of their always trying to write mixed Latin and English, so losing the grace of the one and the sense of the other. And, in this point of the diffraction of light I am stopped dead by their confusion of idea also, in using the words undulation and vibration as synonyms. “When,” says Professor Tyndall,4 “you are told that the atoms of the sun vibrate at different rates, and produce waves of different sizes,—your experience of water-waves will enable you to form a tolerably clear notion of what is meant.”

“Tolerably clear”!—your toleration must be considerable, then. Do you suppose a water-wave is like a harpstring? Vibration is the movement of a body in a state of tension,—undulation, that of a body absolutely lax. In vibration, not an atom of the body changes its place in relation to another,—in undulation, not an atom of the body remains in the same place with regard to another. In vibration, every particle of the body ignores gravitation, or defies it,—in undulation, every particle of the body is slavishly submitted to it. In undulation, not one wave is like another; in vibration, every pulse is alike. And of undulation itself, there are all manner of visible conditions, which are not true conditions. A flag ripples in the wind, but it does not undulate as the sea does,—for in the sea, the water is taken from the trough to put on to the ridge, but in the flag, though the motion is progressive, the bits of bunting keep their place. You see a field of corn undulating as if it was water,—it is different from the flag, for the ears of corn bow out of their places and return to them,—and yet, it is no more like the undulation of the sea, than the shaking of an aspen leaf in a storm, or the lowering of the lances in a battle.

And the best of the jest is, that after mixing up these two notions in their heads inextricably, the scientific people apply both when neither will fit; and when all undulation known to us presumes weight, and all vibration, impact,—the undulating theory of light is proposed to you concerning a medium which you can neither weigh nor touch!

All communicable vibration—of course I mean—and in dead matter: You may fall a-shivering on your own account, if you like, but you can’t get a billiard-ball to fall a-shivering on its own account.



  1. ‘Human Interference’ – a short DIY film response by Bobby Watts, BA (Hons) Acting and Performance, Sheffield Hallam University, Thursday 11 December 2025.


In this film, I'm making the stark contrast between urban and rural landscapes and how certain aspects of the urban world interfere with rural landscapes. Sections 3 and 22 appealed to me as a filmmaker because they are more relevant today than ever before as governments discuss building on Greenfield sites. I chose this location because I travel through this environment frequently and human interference is evident.

My story relates to climate anxiety as the natural landscapes are being taken over by urban landscapes and my film portrays the evidence of this.

My sense of voice has been changed due to the writings of Ruskin and my environmental perspective has developed through my heightened awareness of the environment changing at a rapid pace. I have also developed new skills through this project such as video, audio and narrative.


 
 

Join the mailing list

Thanks for submitting!

Screen Shot 2024-05-16 at 20.08.36.png
Guild_of_St_George_logo (1).jpeg
ed1ca4fa-629f-4df2-b988-3c0f1ad19ba4-removebg-preview.png-4.avif
Sheffield Museums.png
Primary Logo 2 (1).jpeg

© 2025 Moot Works Ltd. All rights reserved.

All photography © Becky Payne

Storm-Cloud logo form by Jake Goodall

bottom of page